TL;DR
Get workout gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Nicole Noren, a longtime ESPN investigative producer, says she quit after the network expanded its sports-betting business, including a 2023 ESPN Bet deal and a later DraftKings partnership. In a Columbia Journalism Review interview, she connected her decision to gambling addiction in her family and criticized ESPN’s treatment of the subject; her account is her own, and the interview does not include responses from ESPN.
Nicole Noren, a longtime ESPN investigative producer, says she left the network after its growing embrace of sports betting conflicted with her experience of gambling addiction in her family. In an interview with Columbia Journalism Review, she described ESPN’s 2023 ESPN Bet deal and subsequent DraftKings partnership as the point at which she could no longer remain, making public her reasons for leaving after 24 years at the company.
Noren told Columbia Journalism Review that ESPN’s betting expansion was troubling because she had seen sports gambling’s consequences at close range. She said her grandfather, father and one of her brothers struggled with addiction. Her family moved repeatedly amid financial upheaval, she said, and she spent parts of her childhood in Las Vegas sportsbooks and at racetracks while her father gambled.
Her brother, Noren said, died at age 36 on a Las Vegas sidewalk after experiencing homelessness. She described that history as central to her decision: “I’m not going to work for a gambling company and have blood on my hands.” She also said the family experience made the issue “very, very personal to me.” Those details are Noren’s account in the interview, rather than independently established findings in the report.
Noren had worked mainly on ESPN’s investigative newsmagazine Outside the Lines and had received Emmy, Murrow and Peabody awards, according to CJR. She said she had pitched investigations into gambling companies and addiction that were not approved. She also recalled a program on the subject that, in her view, was toned down from what some staff members had intended. The interview does not identify specific pitches or provide ESPN’s response to those criticisms.
A Gambling Deal Meets Editorial Concerns
Noren’s account puts a personal and newsroom dimension on ESPN’s commercial shift into sports betting. The network’s brand and reach give its betting promotions visibility among sports fans; Noren argued that this could normalize gambling without enough attention to addiction’s consequences. Her criticism also raises questions about whether a major sports outlet can report independently on an industry from which it earns revenue.
Her departure does not establish that ESPN’s betting arrangements caused harm to particular viewers, or that its reporting was shaped by commercial interests. But a veteran producer’s account of rejected pitches and perceived changes to editorial independence offers a firsthand perspective on the potential tension between journalism and betting partnerships. That tension matters as ESPN prepares to carry its first Super Bowl, scheduled for February in the interview’s time frame, while maintaining a commercial relationship with DraftKings.
From Betting Distance to Partnerships
ESPN’s relationship with gambling changed after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a federal ban on sports betting in 2018. A year later, Disney CEO Bob Iger told investors he did not see the company becoming involved in gambling “in the near term” by facilitating it. That earlier position provides context for why the network’s later moves surprised Noren, CJR reported.
In 2023, ESPN licensed its name to a betting app called ESPN Bet. The CJR report said the deal was expected to generate $1.5 billion for the network over 10 years, while describing the app as an embarrassing flop. ESPN subsequently replaced that arrangement with a partnership with DraftKings. In March, the companies enabled customers to link their ESPN and DraftKings accounts, according to the report. The partnership’s announcement described it as going beyond a traditional marketing arrangement.
Noren said she had observed a weakening boundary between editorial work and business interests roughly five to seven years before the interview. She worked on investigations involving sensitive subjects, including gender-based violence, college students’ mental health and concussions. She told CJR that the shift in ESPN’s approach to betting, alongside her family history, made staying untenable.
““I don’t see the Walt Disney Company, certainly in the near term, getting involved in the business of gambling, in effect, by facilitating gambling in any way.””
— Bob Iger, then Disney CEO, speaking to investors in 2019, as quoted by CJR
ESPN’s Response and Editorial Record
The CJR interview excerpt does not include a response from ESPN to Noren’s claims about rejected pitches, a program she considered softened, or her concerns about the network’s betting promotions. It also does not provide documents or detailed examples that would independently substantiate how editorial decisions were made. The extent of any influence from ESPN’s commercial partnerships on specific coverage is not established by Noren’s account.
The interview’s source material also does not state when Noren’s final day occurred, give a detailed financial accounting of ESPN Bet’s performance, or quantify the effects of ESPN’s promotions on viewers. Her account of her family’s experiences and her interpretation of the network’s choices should be understood as her testimony. Further reporting would be needed to assess the broader claims about editorial policy and audience impact.
Betting Coverage Under Continued Scrutiny
The interview does not announce a planned investigation, policy change or response from ESPN. The immediate next developments to watch are whether ESPN or its parent company addresses Noren’s account and how the network handles coverage and promotion of gambling as its DraftKings relationship continues.
ESPN’s planned first Super Bowl broadcast, identified in the interview as coming in February, is another high-profile point at which the network’s sports coverage and betting business may intersect. No changes to the partnership or editorial rules were confirmed in the material provided, so those questions remain open.
Key Questions
Who is Nicole Noren?
Noren is a former ESPN producer who worked at the network for 24 years, mainly on the investigative program Outside the Lines. CJR said she received Emmy, Murrow and Peabody awards.
Why did Noren leave ESPN?
She told Columbia Journalism Review that ESPN’s expansion into sports betting conflicted with her concerns about gambling addiction, shaped by addiction and financial hardship in her own family. She pointed to the ESPN Bet launch and DraftKings partnership as part of that shift.
What did Noren say about her reporting on gambling?
Noren said she had pitched stories examining gambling companies and addiction that were not approved. She also said a program on the issue was toned down from what some staff members had wanted. The interview does not include details of the pitches or ESPN’s response.
What is ESPN’s relationship with DraftKings?
After its ESPN Bet arrangement, ESPN entered a partnership with DraftKings. CJR reported that the companies enabled customers to link their accounts in March. The source material does not provide further terms of the current partnership.
Has ESPN responded to Noren’s criticism?
The CJR interview material provided here does not include an ESPN response. It also does not establish whether the network has changed its editorial policies or betting promotions in response to her concerns.
Source: hn
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
